@ttto that is neat and I really like it. one small crit though: sorry, it’s for accessibility!
in the love.js you preventDefault the touchstart event on the document object. can you put that on the canvas tag instead? it’s preventing me from zooming in on mobile.
i had no idea i could put mouse/touch event listeners on things that weren't the document, i just assumed i'd have to calculate offsets or something. this has made my js canvas life better, thx
@ttto it only displays the first image. Cannot reproduce on Firefox 68 though. I'll check tomorrow if i have any error message on the other computer.
@a_breakin_glass plz let me know the browser and OS you're using!
i expect things to work if you're using something that supports js canvas, i'd like to fix things if it's broken. thanks!
after a coffee and solving some problems
Here's me... wait...Were are you gone ? https://ttto.cafe/gallery/images/face/PoorPocketsMcNewHold_d94db2.png
And by the way, That's legitimate generated character. http://ttto.cafe/shindan/gallery/PoorPocketsMcNewHold_d94db2?twit=ok
Still love it despite this result.
I've tested it on my smartphone, on firefox.
@poorpocketsmcnewhold thank you! that's super interesting, i know there are some ways that this could fail but generating a blank face was not one i expected
I was using it on my phone, so it was sightly more difficult to notice that detail,when i've didn't got any prompts for it. Regardless, Pretty surprised that the website in itself outputed a blank avatar.
@ttto Was it because the unique browser fingerprint or other browser features, was used in order t randomized the avatar look ?
We, you didn't really understood what i meant.
The website propose you two choices to make, and depending to those choices, they display your avatar result.
The thing is, that the avatar was rendered blank on the server results, and not just my computer (Due to the resist fingerprint).
So, I've tought the generator worked like this,
The two choices to define the type of character to be generated, and the canvas of your browser fingerprint IN THE ONLY purpose of randomizing the final results.
And since my browser blocked canvas access, It returned a null canvas value to the generator, explaining why they was nothing.
@poorpocketsmcnewhold @ttto well I explained that on the canvas element, there's some functions for getting the image in it (to send to the server, in this case). They have been used for fingerprinting because when drawing a font into it, it renders differently in every system. But in this case, it's not being used for fingerprinting
the app works by calling .toDataURL() on a hidden canvas object, and sending that to the server. it's right that firefox's anti-fingerprinting rejects this, because it's possible that .toDataURL() could be used maliciously.
it's very difficult to get precisely the same canvas results on the server, so i opted to use the client as the only source of the image. i do save the data to regenerate the images, though
i wasnt expecting just how varied this can be honestly wow. v surprised when i got a cat just messing with the sliders even lmao
Mastodon.ART — Your friendly creative home on the Fediverse! Interact with friends and discover new ones, all on a platform that is community-owned and ad-free. Admin: @Curator. Moderators: @EmergencyBattle, @ScribbleAddict, @TapiocaPearl, @Otherbuttons, @katwylder