** The problem:
* By 2040 emissions from computing alone will be close to half the emissions level acceptable to keep global warming below 2°C. This growth in computing emissions is unsustainable: it would make it virtually impossible to meet the emissions warming limit.
* The emissions from production of computing devices far exceed the emissions from operating them, so even if devices are more energy efficient producing more of them will make the emissions problem worse. Therefore we must extend the useful life of our computing devices.
** The solution:
As a society we need to start treating computational resources as finite and precious, to be utilised only when necessary, and as effectively as possible. We need frugal computing: achieving the same results for less energy.
** The vision: please read the article, I'm out of characters.
@wim_v12e 25 years! I thought I was doing great with my 10-year-old desktop and 7-year-old laptop (both of which I do not intend to replace before 2025 unless I have a compelling reason to do so).
A computer that is 25 years old today would be an old-world Mac or a PC built for Windows 98. I agree with the article but woof! That’s a big thing to ask.
@wim_v12e Agree entirely. By the way, as I wrote up the post for my secret link log, I realized that maybe some people are getting hung up on the definition of scarcity that is implicit in the article. You mean computer resources are scarce-as-in-oil but some people including in this thread read it as scarce-as-in-gold. Is this a good way to think about it?
@reinderdijkhuis What is the difference between scarce-as-in-oil and scarce-as-in-gold? I am not familiar with those terms.
I did not say that compute resources are scarce, I said that we should treat them as finite and precious.
Finite does not necessarily mean they have to be scarce, that depends on the demand vs availability. For example, there is a finite supply of air in the world, but as yet air is not scarce. (It could become scarce if we keep on polluting it of course.)
My ideal is definitely to do more with less, so that the finite amount of compute bounded by the need for sustainability lets us do all that is necessary.
But it is very well possible that if we truly limit our computing to what is sustainable, it will become more scarce and therefore more expensive.
Can you elaborate what people are hung up about? What is the problem they see?
Mastodon.ART — Your friendly creative home on the Fediverse! Interact with friends and discover new ones, all on a platform that is community-owned and ad-free. (翻译：DeepL)mastodon.art是艺术家和艺术爱好者的空间，而不是政治内容的空间--有许多其他的fediverse实例，你可以加入以获得更多的一般内容(而且你仍然可以从任何实例中关注你在.art上的朋友)；见https://instances.social :)