Early : Meet Balu, the cuddly cute but slightly dense angel of a feline that one of my friends is blessed with.

If you want to by Balu a treat, you can buy 4k wallpapers of some images on Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/s/01b5cab43a
(I will give 100% to his human, who is a student and not making much money)

@eyeling these are captivating and astonishing. The tweaked colours are something else.

@dch Thanks. Unnatural looking grass is a main feature of infrared photography. Was rather surprised how natural cats appear in it. Humans certainly do not.

@eyeling I love the blue much more than the red. do you have a higher res version of these available? I'd like to put them on my desktop background.

@dch Yeah, should have. I'll get back to you when back in front of my PC.

@dch 4k wallpapers of some images on Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/s/01b5cab43a
(They're currently at 3€, forgot to set the additional pay-what-you-want. Will do that tomorrow. But if you feel generoud, I will give 100% of any payment to his human, who is a student and not making much money)

@eyeling @dch

Wait, so this is straight infrared? You didn't photoshop in a natural-light picture of Balu?

@suetanvil @dch Yes. Full 550nm IR. Fur seems to be pretty unaffected at this wavelength.

@Sylvhem He certainly looks overwhelmed. But he always does. 🙈

@eyeling Surreal, but beautiful.

May I ask an ignorant question? The cat is the biggest heat source in the photos, so why doesn't he or she glow red? If I were to take equivalent photos with my cheap thermal camera (which, I know, is a different technology), Balu would be by far the brightest object in the frame.

@markusl This kind of IR isn't thermal. Yes, I called it "IR", but "near infrared" would be more appropriate. It's a 550nm lowpass filter which lets parts of visible light through. Thermal radiation doesn't register in a relevant way. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared

@eyeling Ah, thanks. I hadn't realised that there was an order of magnitude between the wavelengths you're capturing and the wavelengths used in thermal imaging. Presumably, an object that was almost hot enough to glow red would shine brightly in a near-IR photo, but a healthy cat doesn't come close to that. 🙂

@markusl Yes, exactly! A friend (physicist) and I hat a lovely time shooting our electric stoves and seeing the heated coils showing up in IR earlier than they're visible to the human eye. It's also fun being able to see through the darkened ceramic glass.

@eyeling @markusl Hah, I guess it makes sense that they'd use a darkening agent that would let through as much IR as possible -- even right up to near IR.

@eyeling @markusl those are really fascinating and abstract. Really like them.

@markusl @eyeling And the particular set of wavelengths that IR photography is highlighting is something that vegetation reflects a ton of, while fur apparently, does not.

@edyother @markusl THIS. I expected cats' fur to reflect similar to human hair, but it doesn't seem to. At least lighter fur doesn't. Black fur seems to work like expected. Case in point:

@eyeling @edyother Thanks. I can't compete. 🙂

From this thermal-imaging photo of our kitchen, I can tell that the dishwasher was on, that we'd recently made some tea, that we were defrosting something on the cooker and that our window frames leak heat, but no one is going to call these garish smudges beautiful or artistic!

(The outlines come from the phone's built-in camera, which operates in visible light. The thermal image comes from an old Flir One, which plugs in via USB.)

@eyeling There are all so good. Absolutely stunning use of infrared photography! :D

The cats are the same in any wavelength. Only the world around them changes...

@skobkin I guess you're right. Cats are eternal, a universal constant.

@eyeling I love these pics so much! They are stunning and Balu is surprisingly expressive for a cat :ablobcatheart:

@aidamarna Yeah, he`s such a cutie. I'll be sure to tell his human about your praise.

@thebiologist1117 That depends on how experienced you are to editing RAW photographs. Having experience there is a definite plus. There are also costs of having a camera converted (though sometimes you can get a cheap one on ebay). You can shoot with just a filter, but colours don't look good in most cameras due to the inbuilt highpass filter.
This video explains it all in detail: youtu.be/i5jllj6A_3w

@eyeling this is incredible! So beautiful, especially the blue ones. Stunning.

@eyeling I'm curious... Are you actually using infrared film, or some other process? (Asks the old man who was a photography major when there was only film.)

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Mastodon.ART — Your friendly creative home on the Fediverse! Interact with friends and discover new ones, all on a platform that is community-owned and ad-free. Admin: @Curator. Currently active moderators: @ScribbleAddict, @TapiocaPearl, @Otherbuttons, @Eyeling, @ljwrites